|
In
case you haven't noticed -- and it's certainly difficult to ignore
-- the World Wide Web is a moving target that's changing at an unprecedented
rate. If you squint just a little, youcan see it morphing right
before your eyes.
While
fortunes are already being won and lost (sometimes in months where
yesterday's businesses used to take years), the ways to make money
online are still evolving. While the future opportunities are huge,
to date the Web has created more "misses" than "hits." This month's
Video Web column looks at the revenue realities and potential of
the Web, as we ask the multi-million dollar question: What relevance
do the Web's financial realities (virtual and otherwise) have for
video professionals?
The
Big Picture
In
terms of direct revenue opportunities, advertising and transactions
(direct sales of merchandise) are the two most widely tracked indicators.
While there's broad agreement among the analysts that the Web is
still just emerging as a player in these markets, the trends reflect
the intensity and the innovative qualities of the Internet's awesome
growth. Remember, there was absolutely no commercial "action" on
the Web just two years ago.
For
example, Steve Olson, a research analyst at the San Francisco investment
banking firm of Volpe, Welty & Company predicts that "By the
year 2000, the Internet will become the data dial tone; and, as
such, Internet access will become as ubiquitous as the telephone."
He continued, "There's just no question that the Internet is big,
getting bigger and is not going away." Although Olson agrees with
most estimates that transactions on the Internet were only about
$700 million in the last year, or about 0.14% of the $2 trillion
dollar retail market; he points out that his prediction of the Internet
increasing to only 1.2% of the retail market in the year 2000 would
mean a total online transaction revenue base of more than $14 billion!
Talk about an emerging giant. And you thought informercials were
a good way to make money.
Cummings
Multimedia Entertainment's Alternative
Entertainment Network shows the promise of new
online video "channels" that redefine narrowcasting.
|
I
agree with Olson that the most significant "gating factor" limiting
the viability of transactions is security and that is purely a perceptual
issue. After all, most people never bat an eye when they read their
credit card numbers over a cordless phone or when they hand their
credit card to a restaurant waiter who disappears with it for minutes
at a time. In truth, these are far greater risks than e-mailing
your credit card without security. And now that all of the biggest
names in the financial world are creating secure transaction environments
online, this perceptual problem is certain to be cleared away.
Another
"gating issue" is compelling content and creative offerings that
depend on the creativity of people like you and me. It's the developers
("developers" is the Internet's name for producers) who are doing
creative online design work, who are the ones charging top dollar,
and who are doing very well financially even in these early days.
More on this below.
.
. . they [Amazon.com] offer
ten times the inventory(over a million titles)
of even the biggest bookstores . . .
One
very lucrative site that has proven the viability of using the web
to create a unique transaction environment is the online bookstore,
Amazon.com. If you haven't heard
of it, you should check it out. They have received critical and
online consumer acclaim because they offer ten times the inventory
(over a million titles) of even the biggest bookstores with the
enhancements of all kinds electronic search and other customer-friendly
features.
Advertising
Another
major financial model is web advertising. As many of you are aware,
many sites that planned on early advertiser support have been struggling
to make ends meet. However, it's very early in the game and much
of the data reflects old media paradigms that don't reveal the true
potential of building advertiser supported businesses on the Net.
According
to Jeanne Dietsch, Vice President of ActivMedia,
Inc., a market research company specializing in online commerce,
"Most advertising revenue projections average $200 - 300 million
for 1996... but they accept as fact the totally unsubstantiated
claim that 66% of ad revenues are captured by the top ten sites."
In ActivMedia's research which is based on returns from over 1100
commercial web sites, 11% of web marketers (tens of thousands of
sites) offer space advertising, with those who supplied revenue
figures having an annualized average of $51,000 (assuming no growth
at all). Dietsch calls this "fairly strong evidence that web ad
revenues are not dense, but rather they are spread widely, as one
would expect from a narrow-casting medium like the Web." This makes
the Web advertising market look more like targeted magazines than
the TV advertising market to which it is more frequently compared.
This
means that web advertising revenue can also be considered an ancillary
revenue opportunity, and in today's developing market it should
not be expected to carry the whole revenue "ball." For example,
this is reflected in my own experience. Because I don't have a sales
force, I operate the Media Mall web site (at this point) more as
a marketing vehicle and labor of love. However, the advertisers
who have supported us have done so because they recognize the high
quality niche audience we deliver. And because the cost of continuing
to grow the Media Mall site is low, I can continue to attract an
ever-increasing audience (15,000 hits last week), and develop more
advertising revenue over time. So even though I don't expect ad
sales from Media Mall to make me rich, it's certainly satisfying
to know that we can deliver value to advertisers as well as to our
readers despite and because of our relatively small, narrow-casting
niche. And while we develop visibility, increase traffic and reap
other benefits, its nice to have part of the expenses offset by
ad revenue.
For
more information of online advertising, check out the extensive
Internet Advertising Report by Morgan Stanley investment analyst,
Mary Meeker.
Part
1 of 2
Next Page>>>
|